Business News

A strong stand on Djokovic’s pardon goes back to Morrison

It came as no surprise when Australian President Scott Morrison stepped into the fray with a bribe given to tennis star Novak Djokovic to play in the first Grand Slam of the year.

Apart from that, the Morrison government was plagued by a number of Omicron cases, a shambolic trial and empty shelves just months before the election.

As for Djokovic, it is do not vaccinate worldwide The men’s tennis player, who announced he was flying to Melbourne to defend his Australian Open title, Morrison, whose Liberal Party is following Labor in the polls, did a disservice.

The Prime Minister warned that Djokovic, who is still in the air, could be reinstated on the “first flight home”. Djokovic’s visa was revoked and he was detained pending trial.

But the decision of the federal court to to prevent visa revocation Monday has embarrassed the Morrison government and is looking into the issue of immigration laws in Australia, a country that prides itself on its strict borders.

The intensive care of the uncircumcised athlete has proven to be very difficult for voters who have endured the most severe closure in the world.

The court ruling has left the Morrison government with two unconstitutional political options.

It may choose to renew Djokovic’s visa, although Morrison has announced he is not allowed to stay in the country. Or it could ban visas and arrest a tennis player. This, however, could be at risk of sparking a diplomatic dispute with the Serbian government as well as street demonstrations in Melbourne, which have just emerged from the world’s most remote Covid-19.

Morrison insisted last week that Djokovic is being treated in the same way as anyone else trying to “cross the border” in Australia.

This dire situation was received by Australians who were outraged when they heard that a seemingly healthy Djokovic was allowed to be released despite the country having strict vaccination laws.

Mark Kenny, a professor at The Australian Studies Institute, said the government was in serious trouble because of the rising risk of disease, the risk of Covid testing and cyberbullying. But it “smelled” voters who were angry with Djokovic’s arrival.

“It was clear that Morrison was happy to look strong at the frontier without mentioning the many failures in Covid’s experiment. It seemed for a while if Morrison won,” Kenny said.

Scott Morrison’s government is facing two unpopular political decisions © AAPIMAGE

For more than two decades, the Liberal Party has drawn a line between its plans and a decision on whether Djokovic’s visa will be revoked will be made by Alex Hawke, the refugee minister and one of the prime minister’s closest allies.

A government official stated: “According to the official policy, Hawke’s prime minister is well-versed in the matter. As the case progresses, for legal reasons it is not necessary to comment further. ”

Maria Jockel, of BDO Migration Services, said a minister who uses his powers to prevent visas had never been seen. But it would have to be justified on the basis of merit and possibly objectionable, which would open the Australian border law for further consideration.

He also said that governments and governments “collectively seek Solomon’s wisdom” to find a solution to border problems such as those provided by the Djokovic saga during the epidemic.

Australia’s strict entry and exit rules have been changed since Djokovic was arrested at Tullamarine Airport in Melbourne. The player’s visa was issued by the federal government but his hospital pardon was signed by two independent medical professional groups, one sponsored by the Victorian government, and issued by a senior Australian Tennis doctor.

But this did not convince him to enter the country and court documents show that Djokovic may have mistyped another document – a travel notice – which is different from a visa.

Kenny said the idea of ​​issuing a visa when it became available to uncircumcised people who could not meet the requirements for entry, forced border guards to “consider a second option”. “The ambiguity has crept into the process,” he said.

Federal and state governments as well as Tennis Australia have tried to sue each other over the dispute over the pardon – that Djokovic had signed an agreement with Covid-19 six months ago – had a heated argument.

Daniel Andrews, Victoria’s Prime Minister, confirmed Tuesday that his government had not set boundaries. “We did not try to persuade the Commonwealth government to allow anyone to enter. Instead, it was very different,” he said.

Anthony Albanese, Labor leader who will compete for a new prime minister in the coming months, said: “Scott Morrison has failed to test, follow, vaccinate and isolate. It is a serious problem of epidemic failure.”

Even some of Morrison’s councilors have called on the government to drop the case. John Alexander, a Liberal MP and former professional tennis player, said it would be “wrong” to try to oust Djokovic after a court ruling. “I see it as something that should not be a political problem,” he told ABC.

However Kenny argued that it was already a political problem for the government. Kenny states: “It could have doubled in my mind. “Either way there is a political price in Morrison.”


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button