The plague has taught Alondra Nelson: Science and technology have nothing to do with human problems, social differences, and moral values.
One year after science became involved in politics within a plague and the presidential campaign, in January President-elect Joe Biden appointed Nelson senior director of science and humanities at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, a new position. Nelson has created scientific and human divisions within OSTP that aim to address a wide range of issues ranging from data and democracy to STEM education. In another development, Biden formed his own scientific adviser Eric Lander, who is also the director of OSTP. boss.
Nelson has finished his work at the crossroads of competition, technology, and publicity, writing about topics such as Habit it could make the world a better place and the way the Black Panthers used medical treatment as a stimulant, leading the group to arouse genetic interest. Then the author of several books, inclusive Living Life on DNA, which monitors consumer growth instinct testing companies and how the desire to learn about their generations led blacks and Mormons to become the first professional practitioners.
Nelson is a professor at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. Prior to his election, he authored a book on OSTP and a major test of Obama’s administration, which included several reports on AI and government policy.
In his introduction to his new post in January, Nelson referred to science as a cultural phenomenon and said the artificial intelligence It can expose or expose dangerous structures that interfere with the search for scientific advancement. In an interview with WIRED, Nelson said black people in particular are a threat to science and technology and have no value.
In an interview, he spoke about Biden’s management’s intentions in making the moon, which is why administrators have no obligation to ban. facial recognition, and issues related to the forthcoming technology as well as people who think they should be held accountable during the administration. The revised notes follow.
WIREDI: In January you talked about the “dangerous architecture under the science we are pursuing” and talked about color change and artificial intelligence. What prompted you to mention genetic and AI mutations in your introduction to the group?
Alondra Nelson: I think what team science and AI share is that that’s what’s in store. There are some things we know about the scales and how data analysis works at a level that is the focus of large-scale analysis as is the case with other machine learning, and that is what is the basis. What I think we still need to take as a genre are the questions related to the analysis of AI research materials and the questions about who can make decisions about what to use and the questions that are asked in scientific and technical research. My expectations are different and different from this OSTP and I feel honest from the past. Science and technology have wreaked havoc on some communities, left communities untouched, and left people without a job for science and technology.
Working in an organization that first recognized racial differences and restoring trust in government if major issues mean that the work of science and technology must be honest in the past and part of restoring trust in government – part of restoring reliance on the ability of science and technology to do good in the world earth-revealing the reality of the flaws and failures of science.
Unfortunately, there are many examples. Next month there will be another Associated Press memorial story which revealed the Tuskegee syphilis study nearly 40 years ago, which is why we are returning to the tradition of remembering this. Then we have a problem with AI from research that what is used is incomplete and that their inadequacy means that they are making inadequacies, errors, and, when used in cultural institutions and legal systems in particular, have untold negative effects on black and brown areas.
Lander said in his hearing that OSTP would respond to discrimination on the basis of what happens in a certain way bias. How does it work?
Source link
