Childcare is very intimate actions. Evolution has made it so powerful that we will risk our lives to protect not only our children, but often every child, even children of other races. Robots, in contrast, are objects created by commercial organizations with commercial intentions, which may include and should include the benefits of their customers, but will not be limited to themselves. Robots, corporations, and other legal or non-legal entities do not have the human instinct to care for the young — although our social norms may cause children and other adults to ignore this principle.
As a result, it is important to consider the potential fraud — both in the form of commercial fraud through parental advertising and self-deception — although robots may not be as damaging to the minds of children and others as they are to psychologically. he can come to love them.
Even TV producers, broadcasters, or online actors are considered to be responsible if children are left to spend too much time watching television. Robotic companies will want to be in the same place, because no company would want to be held responsible for child molesters, so it is possible that manufacturers will not sell artificial intelligence (AI) and the power to use their robots. As a result it is possible that any robots (as well as those in areas with strong consumer protection) will be sold primarily as toys, lighting equipment, and possibly household appliances. They will be brightly colored and deliberately designed to attract parents and children. We expect a wide range of products, some with high quality and some with a humanoid look. Parents are keenly aware of the robot’s ability to handle and disrupt their child. Robotic companies will fix it
direct experiences for parents and children, as do television presenters. But robots have always had their drawbacks, such as “the device is not a toy and should be used by supervising adults” or “the device is for fun only. It should not be viewed as education. ”
Still, parents feel that they can leave their children alone with their robots, just as they can leave their children to watch TV or play with other children. The people are amazing students and they know exactly what happens all the time and use what they can. Parents are keenly aware of the educational value of robots with advanced AI and communication skills. Occasional horror stories, such as the robot nanny and the little tragedy in the book Scarlett and Gurl, make a headline and remind parents how to use the robots carefully.
This can be continued until or unless the adverse event needs to be redesigned, to improve consumer safety standards, validated information requirements, and / or risk uncertainty, all of which will improve the industry. In the meantime, journalists will cover the rescue of children in unexpected ways, as they do now when children (or adults) are rescued by some toddlers and dogs. This should not make people think that they should leave children alone with robots, but because of the habit we already have of making robots anthropomorphize, it can make parents feel comfortable — until the next dangerous story makes headlines.
In terms of responsibility, we need to be able to explain the same types of tools used in the game for robotic nannies manufacturers: Make your robots reliable, explain what they do correctly, and provide complete information on the obvious dangers of misuse. Then, in addition to special cases of malpractice in production or manufacturing, such as aspects of childbirth and childbirth, the legal obligation will have a parent or adult adult, as is the case here, as it should be under the existing drug risk law. .
Source link
