Business News

Iran hardliners caution in Vienna’s nuclear talks

Nearly five months after Ebrahim Raisi was elected president of Iran, the Islamic Republic and the West have agreed on a date to resume talks suspended in Vienna over a nuclear deal.

But days after last week’s announcement of the November 29 talks, Iranian officials expressed serious doubts that talks with delegates from the UK, France, Germany, Russia and China over the agreement that US President Donald Trump left in 2018 provided more.

With U.S. and European officials saying they are close to finalizing an agreement with the President’s interim president, Hassan Rouhani, the courageous now ruling Tehran have shown little expectation of progress.

“Holding nuclear talks is not important because Iran’s new approach does not depend on the JCPOA. [nuclear deal] and not to put money into something that has already failed, ”said one of the hardliners.

“The other side is coming to negotiate and tell Iran ‘you are a bad boy’. Iran, which has devoted itself to negotiations and negotiations, is calmly responding and putting its list of demands on the table, which the US may find expensive and illegal.”

Under the 2015 treaty, Iran agreed to ban its nuclear activities to lift international sanctions. Trump has blamed Iran for violating the spirit of the alliance by becoming “the leader of a terrorist regime” and pursuing a plan to launch missiles. He imposed sanctions on the country, which still exist.

The new Iranian president believes the country’s economy can prosper, even with sanctions, by strengthening domestic services and strengthening trade relations with neighboring countries. And the Islamic State, which has expanded its uranium enrichment operations after the US repatriation of sanctions, is not satisfied with US President Joe Biden’s promises that Washington will return to the alliance if Iran returns to full compliance.

With Iran concerned over Trump’s return to the 2024 US elections, Iranian officials have asked for “assurance” from Biden that the future US government will not abandon the alliance.

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian also said the US could release $ 10bn of Iranian currency deposited in foreign banks as a viable option and a first step, which the Republic could set for this month’s talks.

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian says US could release $ 10bn of Iranian currency deposited in foreign banks as approval © Kremlin / dpa

“The US president, who does not have a lot of power, is not ready to give a guarantee,” Ali Shamkhani, Iran’s security chief, said last Wednesday. “If what is happening here does not change, the consequences of [November] The discussion is clear from now on. ”

Hardliners doubt Biden’s ability to comply. “Biden is weak and will not be able to enter into an agreement with Iran,” he said. “Would he pull Iran’s money out of the opposition? [to Iran] in Congress and the Senate? The answer is no. ”

In previous sessions, the EU chaired Joint Commission meetings in the basement of a luxury hotel in Vienna and facilitated discussions between the Iranian delegation and the US delegation at a nearby hotel. This cannot be changed. Washington’s special envoy to Iran, Rob Malley, has traveled to Vienna for talks, but is not expected to take part directly.

“Iran will negotiate with the US only if we see real change,” the Iranian deputy added. “But considering all the political barriers in Iran and the US, no negotiations with the US and no alliance is expected in the future.”

The EU is also concerned about greater potential. But bloc officials insist that just getting the commitment to resume negotiations is already a good thing. “We are not talking, and that is a good thing,” said the EU ambassador. “We’ll be back around the table.”

Demonstrating how difficult the talks could be, France, the UK and Germany – along with the US – last month criticized Iran for developing its nuclear program and obstructing the International Atomic Energy Agency’s assessment of “risks.”[ing] the possibility of a return to the JCPOA ”.

Going forward, the four countries said, “only if Iran changed. . . This is the only sure way to prevent the catastrophic increase, which is of no benefit in any country. ”

Ali Vaez, Iran’s leader in the International Crisis Group, said there was a risk that the new Iranian group led by Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Bagheri Kani would focus on historical concerns rather than real progress in forming an alliance.

“I do not think anyone wants to pull the plug on these talks before the deadline.

Western experts warn that hopes for an end to the deal will diminish if negotiations reach a new year. Ned Price, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of State, said on Wednesday last week that the US still believes it is possible “to reach an immediate and mutual understanding to come back to the cause. [2015 nuclear pact]”, but that at some point, Iran’s progress could make a return to the treaty” as inappropriate as the United States and our allies “.


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button