“All my research is on what social media can do to make things better,” said David Rand, a MIT professor and co-author of the study examining the impact of the Trump vaccine. “But I think television and radio, especially TV and immovable radios, are just getting free access right now, albeit surprisingly harmful.”
Biden’s Facebook criticism is twice the success of Fox News. Not only does it capture the interest of vaccine-prone networks, but it also focuses on government-linked right-wing wings and Big Tech-linked networks to eliminate spectators. “I just think that this kind of relationship between a big government and a big organization with friends, guys, is dangerous. And I really enlighten you, ”Missouri senator Josh Hawley said He said Thursday somewhere else? – Fox News. The outrage inspires careful media over the weekend, with all Republican lawmakers and lawmakers respecting, as Ted Cruz put it, “their desire to trample on speech, violate the Constitution, use governmental restraint, whatever we feared they might do.”
It’s easy to see why the White House can spend money on Facebook politics instead of Fox News: Facebook can listen. Biden has no chance of publishing the right-wing journalists. When a Fox News reporter doubts the safety or intelligence of a vaccine, it is no exaggeration; and tonight’s programs. Most people on Facebook, by contrast, would not like to be accused of poisoning American information.
Which, according to Facebook, is not. Mu blog post Last week, Guy Rosen, vice vice president of integrity at Facebook, said Facebook has been supporting the vaccine. He said “more than 2 billion people have seen the reliability of Covid-19 and vaccination on Facebook” since the epidemic began, when the company has “eliminated more than 18 million cases of Covid-19 fraud.” He added that Facebook had already followed all eight of the doctor’s recommendations – which would include Murthy’s assertion that companies “provide researchers with the necessary information to analyze the spread of falsehoods.”
On the contrary, the popular Facebook does not provide much of the information necessary to understand what is happening on its platform. Note, for example, that Rosen’s blog post does not say how many users have seen the reliability of Covid or vaccines. Facebook announces content-related statistics – preferences, shares, etc. – but he refuses to reveal himself data about “access,” meaning how many people see the content. Nor does it offer anything related to its efforts to curb the spread of fraud.
“People do not know what Facebook is or are not dealing with vaccination fraud, and they do not realize whether the problem is serious or not,” said Rand, a MIT professor. “There’s a lot of work going on in this company with a lot of smart people to reduce the risk of false positives, but they don’t say much about it.”
Rand said platforms like Facebook should connect with external researchers on powerful research on what does not work and what does not work to combat false information about the vaccine – and announce its results. He added that Facebook has had enough information to be able to determine how vaccine disclosure affects global systems. “They’re doing vaccination-controlled trials every day, they just don’t think so,” he said.
Surprisingly, in giving one Recognizing the root of the problem, Facebook seems to have become increasingly confused between the obvious and the hidden. YouTube provides very little information to researchers, helping them it flies under political and regulatory control despite its great importance. In the meantime, Facebook is providing enough information through CrowdTangle for investigators and journalists to find the company’s bludgeon – but then hides the evidence it claims to prove.
Source link
