What Google should find are treated as a local telephone company? The idea that a visible, visible front of the internet should be corrected if the common carriers or public utilities have been push around for a while. But it began to explode in April, when Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas suggested that a common law order would allow Congress to oversee those who would help. Ohio attorney general Dave Yost filed a lawsuit in June asking the court to rule that “Google’s online searches are considered to be public and / or public services in accordance with Ohio law.” Last week, Yost published a file of op-ed inside New York Times claiming that this approach is a way to prevent Google from liking its business more than its competitors who rely on its customers. “The more cases the case involves, the less likely it is that the antitrust laws require it,” he wrote.
Unfortunately, I also shed some light on the concept.
“This guy has a lot of frustration,” said Barbara Cherry, a professor at Indiana University Media School who studies general automotive law. For lawyers, it is especially careless. ”
The first red flag in Ohio cases is that it does not attempt to define what a common or useful public carrier is. The second red flag is that Yost indicates that the two ideas can be exchanged. All he wants, he wrote in Time Op-ed, is a “simple declaration that, in accordance with the law, Google is a public, or private, public carrier.” Instead, ordinary carts are not the kind that help ordinary people.
“There’s a lot of misunderstanding about what a common carrier is, and what the government uses,” says Cherry, who has been following a networking device before going to training. “It’s a different kind of law, and the reason why an organization is accredited has so many different reasons. It just so happens that some organizations are able to carry and use human resources, but the reason is that they meet both.”
The concept of public support, Cherry explained, means a business that has signed an agreement with another sector of government to provide services to the general public. In exchange, they receive a benefit or transfer of power from the government. Think of an electrical company that has the power to improve controls but is controlled by prices.
“Government services are based on a collective bargaining agreement between a government and an organization that is supposed to be a government,” Cherry said. But Google, frankly, has no agreement with the government to provide a search engine.
Okay, but what about Google being a common carrier? Once again, Cherry said Yost was misinterpreting the rule. The most common, he explained, is a legal concept that originated in the economics of ancient England. An ordinary carrier was a man who volunteered to take anything from everyone in the group. Anyone who chose to do business in this way had other legal responsibilities, including non-discrimination.
Originally “carrier” refers to real – for example, pilots. Nowadays, it can integrate multiple models, as well as mobile phone companies. The secret is to get involved in politics. “Ordinary carriers, by definition, are just a means to an end,” Cherry explained. “It doesn’t improve the content.” That was the foundation of political neutrality A law passed by the Federal Communication Commission in 2015 (and abolished under Trump’s administration), which provided for the transportation of online service providers such as Comcast and AT&T. Because ISPs are data conduits, it makes sense to prevent them from capturing data differently depending on the source.
Source link
