But the benefits of the treaty, which are ultimately universally accepted, are far more widespread than they affect the ozone layer. Many of these chemicals also contain strong greenhouse gases. Hence the main advantage, their decline over the past three decades has reduced temperatures and may reduce them 1 ˚C for global warming by 2050.
Now, a new research in Nature also shows another important bonus, if unknown, to reduce the stress that radiation from the sun grows on plants, inhibiting photosynthesis and reducing growth. Montreal’s law has prevented the “catastrophic collapse of forests and fields” that would have created more air pollution, Anna Harper, a senior lecturer in climate science at the University of Exeter and co-author of the document, said. in email.
The journal Nature, published on August 18, found that if ozone depletion increased by more than 3% each year, UV radiation would reduce the growth of trees, grass, fern, flowers, and crops worldwide.
Earth’s vegetation takes in less carbon dioxide, releasing 645 billion tons of carbon dioxide into space in this century. This can cause a temperature of up to 1 ˚C at the same time. It could also have a detrimental effect on agricultural productivity and food security around the world.
The rising power of CFCs on plants, plus their temperature in the atmosphere, could have produced a temperature of around 2.5 ˚C in this century, all above demonstrations already warming up to 2100, the researchers found.
“Although originally designed as a treaty to protect the ozone layer, the Montreal Protocol has become a successful climate change treaty,” says Paul Young, a meteorologist at Lancaster University and another journalist.
All of this raises the question: Why can the world not agree on a dictatorship that is designed to withstand climate change? Some students feel that there is an important lesson to be learned from the Montreal agreement, which is needed in the near future, as the next UN summit approaches.
New features
In the meantime, the earth will continue to heat up for the next few decades no matter what, such as UN climate report warned last week. But further growth depends largely on how climate damage can be reduced in the next few decades.
So far, countries have failed, through the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, to ratify the treaty with sufficient promises to eliminate carbon dioxide. The nations will convene the next UN summit in Glasgow in early November, with the aim of achieving these goals in the Paris agreement.
Experts have written long sheets and complete books education review from the Montreal Protocol, and common and different between tests on CFCs and air conditioning.
The common perception is that its importance is limited. CFCs were an easy problem to deal with because they are made up of a single component – especially by large companies like DuPont – and are used sparingly.
On the other hand, almost every part of each of the components emits greenhouse gases. Oil is a powerful source of energy for the global economy, and many of our machinery and equipment are manufactured around them.
But Edward Parson, a professor of environmental law at the University of California, Los Angeles, says it’s time to review the Montreal Protocol course.
This is because the dangers of climate change are recurring and dangerous, more and more countries are demanding stricter laws, and companies are getting closer to what they like the DuPont did:
In other words, we are getting to the point where establishing sustainable laws is possible, which is why it is important to take advantage of this opportunity to do better.
Strict, consistent rules at all times
Parson is the secretary of Protecting the Ozone Group: Science and Techniques, a comprehensive history of the Montreal Protocol published in 2003. Emphasize that the removal of toxic ozone was a problem far beyond the public eye, for much of the world’s economy depends on them in some way.
He asserted that his confession had been obtained through torture, and that his confession had been obtained through torture.
Instead, the implementation of alternative measures took place after the legislation was enacted. The rapid pace of development continued when the rules were strict, and companies, professionals, and technology organizations have described how progress can be made and how quickly it can be achieved. This led to some of the best ways to “respond with repetition,” says Parson.
Hope for new lucrative markets also helped. Many of these companies have made a lot of money from exchanges to new products.
This shows that the world does not have to wait for new developments that will make it cheaper and easier to adapt to climate change. Countries need to enact legislation that significantly reduces emissions, forcing industries to find clean ways to generate energy, grow food, produce, and move goods and people around the world.
Source link
