The skill that Donald Trump excels at is making good news and making sure every American hears – no need for mentors. This is what he did in 2016 and he has tried to repeat if he can run for President again. The first was about dumping the Washington swamp. Now it is about democracy to steal elections. If Trump had put his 2016 horse through the advisory committee, it would have come out like a camel. But he stuck to his counsel.
The secret to Trump’s unpredictable success, which Democrats seem to be missing, is the clear speech of the entire American population at one time, even the most unjust. It is in stark contrast with the microtargeting that Democrats love most. This is strange, because Democrats claim to represent “the people”. Fighting for ordinary Americans is easy to sell when your advertising fits the variety.
Many of President Joe Biden’s challenges can be traced back to his party’s tendency to consider Americans in groups – rural women, blacks, whites, Hispanics, minorities, male college graduates and so on. The American people have more in common than these ideas agree. The theory is that most parts of the world are inclusive of American society. Yet looking at what divides people also strengthens their diversity.
The problem is not with the messages alone. The coating also disturbs the contents. Biden’s “reconstruction” plan it should be the success of well-known strategies – lower medical prices, paid leave, better child care and higher taxes for the rich. As soon as it came into the hands of congressional Democrats, however, it got into a raging crisis. While everyone is important, no one is.
In the midst of the controversy, Biden’s popular ideas were either downplayed or discarded. The result is a bilu which gives the American superpowers – the richest. They can easily sleep now since interest rates, which allow their allies to see financial gain as money – as Warren Buffett put it, pay less tax than their correspondents – are probably safer. As it stands, the bill will also give wealthy Americans greater tax cuts than they received in the 2017 Trump general tax.
How can a party that mentions “people” give more to those who don’t really need it? The answer is simple; the democratic party does not agree on what it means by people. The integration of the groups is less than the sum of its components. This makes it easier for people with large corporations – free-living people living in high-tax areas, such as New York and California – to find their way. The results are disastrous. Jason Furman, Barack Obama’s former financial adviser – and frankly – calls the tax “disgusting”. It is also wrong because it allows Republicans to say Democrats are hypocrites.
Treating American voters as automatons – as opposed to a large group with economic concerns, or as citizens – makes it easier to list some as dirty. Criticism of language is very close. This makes Democrats lazy, which leads to inefficiency. The inability of humans to compensate for their failure makes it difficult for some of the good angels to follow their course. This is what Obama did – and he is the only Democrat since the 1940s to win twice the presidential election. Like Andrew Yang, former Democratic President, he said last week: “The majority of Americans are simply sickened by this political system run by consultants and. . . see through it. They think it’s a lie. ”
The American political crisis must be challenged for its findings. But few democratic scholars seem ready to change. As Upton Sinclair, a leading critic, once said: “It is difficult to persuade a man to understand something when his wages are based on his misunderstandings.”
This means that Democrats will have to go to the polls next year with a cloud message without the proper fear that a Republican victory could bring. Democrats would not be happy to hear this, but could learn one or two tricks from Trump.
