“It will be difficult to compete with SpaceX in this region, because of its visible opportunity for implementation. Competitors exist and are still being developed, however, they show that the market is still seeing opportunities, ”writes Matthew Weinzierl, an economist at Harvard Business School who specializes in space marketing, in an email at WIRED.
A representative for the SpaceX communications team has rejected WIRED interview requests.
But a representative from Amazon said the company is aware of the dangers of light pollution. “Enlightenment is a key factor in design and development. We have already developed a number of design ideas and activities that will help reduce our impact on astronomy, and we are engaging with the community to understand their concerns and realize what we can do,” the spokesman said via email. .
Katie Dowd, director of the OneWeb of North and North Affairs, North America, wrote in an email to WIRED that the company was talking to groups, including the Royal Astronomical Society of the UK and the American Astronomical Society, to understand satellite imagery, “and to create “We are also conducting a concerted effort to see the results.”
SpaceX and its fighters cannot avoid light damage; he can only reduce it. Each object in the atmosphere reflects a gradual glare in its orbit, depending on its shape, color, and size. As the satellites turn upside down to Earth, a small amount of sunlight is often reflected on the ground, too, with the satellite body and its solar power.
Earlier last year, SpaceX tested the Starlink satellite Darksat, offering it a one-way test, including antennas, to reduce light, which the company says is a 55% reduction. Mu one sheet, some astronomers found that the scale disturbed the satellite but not to that extent, even though it made the satellite visible to the naked eye. One he did not realize the great darkness. They found that satellite lighting can vary, however, depending on the shape of the screen and how light diffuses the atmosphere.
According to a write it on the company page, SpaceX found that the darkness was hot, putting satellite equipment at risk, and that it still illuminated infrared light. So the company tried another method called Visorsat, and sent a number of four-cornered satellites, similar to those used on a car window. The vision aims to ensure that the sunlight emanating from the satellite system is reflected away from Earth.
So far, SpaceX has not made any public announcements about how the system works, or how it compares with Darksat. But another scientist, in an unpublished paper sent to the arxiv.org preprint server, by the working Boley team, all find that 70% of Visorsat spacecraft were still brighter than they expected: a measure that would confirm Vera C. Rubin Observatory’s images it won’t have any problems.
To address the problem of air pollution and to solve problems, the American Astronomical Society convened a conference on climate change, called SatCon2. He plans to provide reports and comments soon, following a meeting that began this Sunday, called “Dark and Silent Darkness of Science and Society, ”Drafted by the United Nations and the International Astronomical Union.
The makers of SatCon2 have made a point of reaching out to a wide range of night sky enthusiasts, including astronomers, astronomers, astronomers, naturalists, and cultural and ethnic groups from the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and other countries. “Everyone wants to get things done at a slow pace. They want companies to do more. This is important for everyone as governments around the world, “said Amina Venkatesan, an astronomer at the University of San Francisco and co-chair of the SatCon2 team.
As part of SatCon2, a team of astronomers working with delegates from SpaceX and five other satellite operators on the highlights of the research that scientists are exploring, and how companies can monitor and reduce the performance of their aircraft. He also discussed measures that could be taken in the US that would include enacting laws on how satellites damage light. This includes the possibility of a law enacted by the Federal Aviation Administration, which establishes the starting and restoring mechanisms, or FCC, which allows circulating radios. Some astronomers also want to see the National Environmental Policy Act to limit their chances of creating space — that is, they see space as a place of insecurity.
Source link
