Sequence is the topic of the day, not because HBO’s name is about to end. Whereas Murdoch – oops, I mean Roy – his brothers elect a men’s throne, in the real world of Zara heiress. Marta Ortega has taken the lead in Inditex, a Spanish fashion conglomerate. Meanwhile, quirky tech titan Jack Dorsey stepping down as a Twitter executive to focus on leading Square, its fintech company, as Photo by Agrawal, head of technology, takes his place on the social media giant.
Perhaps this new arrangement will give Dorsey more time to think about cryptocurrency, as well as more space for the afternoon. yoga training that promoter businessman Paul Singer must have been disgusted by it. Singer of Elliott Management demanded that Dorsey be fired because no one should lead the two state-owned companies. It could also be a sign of a major shift from the C-suite, as market conditions and real wealth grow, and the leadership of large state-owned enterprises grows.
One could argue that it has been so for the past two years, of course. In the first half of 2020, when the epidemic broke out, the boards demanded that CEOs be replaced by Covid-19. But the number of change announcements has risen sharply since the second half of 2020, according to research of Russell 3000 and S&P 500 written by the Conference Council earlier this year. Leaders of the organizations cited the amount of “extreme fatigue after a year of frustration and stress management”, as the report’s authors put it.
This can be seen because the difference in successive prices between bad companies and good ones, which are usually large, is much lower. The increasing number of departures seems to be on the rise for executives leaving their jobs such as dismissals.
It can get worse. Even before the plague, the depth and size of the digital revolution were making one of the most powerful and difficult-to-remember businesses. Add to the new concerns about employee health, product reliability, consumer spending, job creation, inflation and the Federal Reserve’s shift from simple financial principles, and you have surprisingly difficult year plans.
In addition, the upcoming integration with acquisition may result in a reduction in the C-suite. The number of state-owned enterprises has dropped by nearly two decades. According to Most OECDs, there are 30,000 fewer now than in 2005. A new Schroder report states that of the 977 companies in the U.S. that were liquidated since 2010, 84 percent did so because they were bought by other companies.
As head of the Schroder of Research and analytics, Duncan Lamont notes: “The number of corporate kidnappings has been steadily rising over the years. But the party must have begun. The conditions are favorable for the expansion of M&A operations: most companies are financially savvy, ‘dry dry’ securities are close to a high profile (costs raised but not yet invested) and borrowing costs are very low. “
All of this can lead to stocks – M&A waves, like sharing, often do. However, it will also bring about integration, which will no doubt lead to new initiatives.
The remaining CEOs will have their hands full. Fed currencies that have been rising in price for a long time are now changing, with Jay Powell, chairman of the central bank, indicating that inflation and inflation are likely to come sooner than expected. That’s a good thing, because it will take away the markets. But it would not be a good benefit. Even the rise in prices we see in goods and services.
Meanwhile, as markets change, corporate leaders face challenges on both sides. At first, freedom fighters like Elliott will no doubt want to fasten their belts. But there will also be pressure from corporations, who are happy to start over, from governments that are looking for better promises of environment, culture and leadership and from anyone who is interested in “stakeholders” instead of “shareholders” in capitalism. .
A good judgment on something other than the share price is a good idea. But there is no clear consensus on what new operational metrics should be – even governments and regulators across the Atlantic are trying to come up with ideas. This is a challenge for business leaders.
But even though metrics may be ambiguous, CEOs are already being monitored by the market not only for acquisition, but also for how they describe conditions, tackling inequality, talent management, chain management, environmental impact and interaction with employees, customers and local communities. .
Indeed, the researchers of the Conference Board feel that this may be another reason for significantly reducing the gap between CEOs who are followed by the best and worst companies. As this research has shown, it is possible that “things that would not happen in the stock market are starting to get heavier” by electing an organization to retain the CEO.
Creative Roys are not the only ones experiencing disruption, price sharing and succession. By choosing or forcing, many managers will soon have more time to achieve success down the dog.
Source link
