Can you start by giving me a place to monitor the weather and understand what’s going on today? How can you measure how the world is doing these things right now?
Air traffic control is a forthcoming phase. We are in the forefront, as global dialogue shapes cultural norms and values. The ultimate goal of improving airflow is to prevent collisions with the atmosphere. Collision, naturally, is a waste-disposal process, which makes the environment vulnerable to pollution and safer for future athletes. The reason is twofold – not just collision destroys satellites; The collision also causes long-term environmental damage. And we see this clearly in the overall analysis of [2009] Iridium-Cosmos hit.
Information about places and locations is another thing – it is the provision of data. Countries and companies around the world recognize where these objects are located and share what is out there. For 50 years, you didn’t want much more than that [the location of debris so it can be avoided]. But when the neighborhood is full of needs, it is not just a question of “How do you avoid waste?” Now it’s “How do you interact with others? [satellite] workers up there? “When there are two mobile satellites that want to be in the same place at the same time, then you will come to the question of direction rather than location.
Along with this, when there is a breakdown between two items, what are the available options for preventing accidents? Is there an outline for you?
I’ve always been eager to find legitimate articles that talk about this process from end to end. I wish I could say, “Go to this source, it will show you what happens from when they will want to get closer until the time a decision is made to make a satellite or not.” But it’s a bit of a stretch. Different users have different internal processes that they do not want to share.
The 18th US Space Force Command Squadron simply looks at the atmosphere and reviews the situation every eight hours. If they see that close proximity is possible, they will provide contact information to satellite users. It then goes into the hands of the landlord to decide what to do with it. And on the 18th he will continue to monitor the situation. The perception of an object in the atmosphere varies greatly depending on the object, the way it is made, the way it is held in the atmosphere around it …
You say that even though air traffic control is seen as a clear metaphor for air travel for good reason — that is, it is about avoiding collisions — but it is a bad example, and maritime law also provides a good one.
International airspaces are selected as a single organization to provide land transport services. For example, the US controls 5 million domestic airplanes but 24 million kilometers of global air. They are the only ones responsible for providing support to air travel with the help of ICAO [International Civil Aviation Organization].
The place has nothing like it. But the oceans do not have this. What the oceans have in terms of corporate governance and control over each ship: the country in which the flag is flying. There are no major maritime officials saying yes or no, you can work here and you can’t work here. Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. In a partnership at sea, there is the right to trade. This is in contrast to the atmosphere, which was previously a speculative region.
The circular motion is not limited to movement [either]. That’s where marketing takes place: connections, long-distance connections, and much more.
Of course, maritime law also means not to collide with large seas. Collision rules, or colregs, dictate what should happen if two ships are present [on course for] head-to-head collision: who should take the lead, if something has happened in a narrow way… These principles are clearly stated. They have the same meaning for the problems we face in space. There is a clear parallel. And if we take a type of plane, we are really trying to force a hollow nail in the middle.
Is there a backlash or a disagreement over the idea of using maritime law as an influence for space law? Does the alliance go to this point?
I think it’s going that way, in virtue [of the fact] that is the only real way to move forward, but there is always a discussion. Having only one person or group to decide what to do is not a real outcome, depending on the location. We do not consider air traffic to be a passenger vehicle because it is not just a safety question. It is a question of negotiation and a question of finance.
Giving air space control in one body can be as simple, as the 18th Space Control Squadron, which offers these services for free. But there are countries that are skeptical of this [idea]. And, of course, there is a cognitive problem. That’s why you get into a crisis of trust — you know, if there could be one reliable thing in the world, of course, we could do that. [But] no one trusts anyone, and loyalty is something that changes over time.
Therefore, the way forward is to create a way for the message to be shared and trusted. For example, I am working on what we are talking about blockchain as a tool for sharing trust. In the nature of blockchain, you can identify who wrote the same and confirmed that they are participants, and the same cannot be changed by anyone else.
Space is often described as a new species of Wild West – lawless and uncontrolled, and everything goes. How can an infrastructure such as air traffic control be established if there is no way to establish basic rules?
I would say the space is not really Wild West. There is an obligation in the 1967 Foreign Treaty that states to control the resources they allow to import from their countries. Therefore it is not the law; it is not completely free. It’s just that we didn’t agree on what it means to continue to monitor.
The Iridium-Cosmos danger was a wake-up call. It led to many activities, such as the development of technical support technical that throwing away big things what remains in space, as well as the development of commercial sensor networks so that we can have a better and better knowledge.
The next big thing, I believe, is a big deal. We see more [potential collision] notifications between two moving satellites, which is a simple problem if we had the rules. This creates a lot of problems for the machines to start implementing these agreements. Capitalism is a very effective motivator. When people see more and more economic opportunities in the traditional way, setting priorities is also encouraging.
Source link
