Three Google employees are on trial for allegedly violating ‘Do Not Be Bad’

Google Highlights “do not be evil” mantra it may have been more sensible than helpful advice, but the former co-workers now want the company to be held accountable. NPR and On the beach say the old Paul Duke scholars, Rebecca Rivers and Sophie Waldman sued Google for violating the company’s “don’t be bad” section. Acts. They say Google fired them for hiring employees opposing opposing activities, such as working with Customs and Border Protection. He should be punished for pointing out the evils like Google as advised, in other words.

Employees at the same time also claimed that Google rejected the popular term because it was too expensive and too sophisticated to make. The internet company thinks it is better to fire people than to admit that its approach changed and to abandon the “benefits” that came with its well-known words.

There are concerns that the case is a vague one. What exactly does it mean? However, the plaintiff’s lawyer Laurie Burgess said “don’t be so mean” was specific so it could be done. The word “must have meaning” if it was in the company code and thus binds, Burgess said.

We asked Google to give us a comment. He had previously accused all employees (including Laurence Berland) of repeatedly violating data protection policies by accessing or sharing confidentiality, but employees and other critics said this was a cover-up.

The case will not result in severe penalties. Google settled with Berland on his departure, e.g. There is a lot of pressure on Google to avoid a permanent dispute while the National Labor Relations Board is in place is still searching for other shots. However, this can be an important issue – even when there is stability, it can open up other complaints about the company. standards of conduct.