[ad_1]
Instead, Amnesty International investigators say they had more time to find and identify Apple devices that are controlled by the Pegasus malware than Android users.
“Based on what Amnesty International has more researchers on Apple iOS devices than Android devices, that’s why our methods are focused first,” the group wrote at length. technical analysis on the findings of Pegasus. As a result, the most recent cases of illness that Pegasus confirmed affected iPhones. “
Some of Apple’s focus resumes due to the company’s assurance of privacy and security in production and advertising.
“Apple is trying, but the problem is not as hard as their history would explain,” says Johns Hopkins University historian Matthew Green.
Although it is a very open method, however, Google is facing similar criticisms on the visibility of security searchers to use mobile phones.
“Android and iOS have different logs. It’s hard to compare them, “said Zuk Avraham, CEO of the ZecOps monitoring team and long-term caregiver to access phone information.
Apple and Google both seem skeptical of revealing more about the digital sausage. And while many independent researchers are advocating this change, others also agree that the proliferation of telemetry can also help perpetrators.
“While we understand that sustainable prices can be useful in enforcing the law as outlined by Amnesty International’s investigators, it will also benefit those who attack,” a Google spokesman said in a statement to WIRED. . ”
Ivan Krstić, chief of Apple security engineering and architecture, said in a statement, “Apple unhesitatingly opposes the attacks on journalists, human rights activists, and others who want a better world. , hence, security analysts agree that the iPhone is the safest, safest device on the market. For many of our services, we continue to work hard to protect all our customers, and we are only adding new security to their equipment and information. ”
The trick is to strike a balance between providing more information without making the activities of the attackers easier. “There is a lot that Apple can do in a very secure way to allow the monitoring and evaluation of iOS devices to capture this type of malware, but it still doesn’t seem to be as important,” says iOS security analyst Will Strafach. “I believe he has good reasons to have this, but I do not agree with it and I would like to change this view.”
Thomas Reed, director of Mac and mobile platforms at the antivirus maker Malwarebytes, says he agrees that getting more information on iOS can benefit users’ security. But he adds that allowing a unique, reliable monitoring program to come with real risks. They also claim that there are suspicious and unnecessary programs on macOS that antivirus can no longer remove because the machine gives them a reliable version of this type, which can be incorrect. The same problem with technical monitoring tools can be found on iOS.
[ad_2]
Source link
